Lost in standards

Dia1In the last “projectie, edition 04-2014”, the bi-monthly magazine of ipma-nl, I published a Dutch article about the many methods and frameworks that are available in the field of portfolio, programme and project management. To download: Verdwaald in het standaardenbos IPMA Projectie magazine 04-2014 I created a sort of quick reference card with available standards and frameworks (It’s limited, there are many more). To download: standards-qrc-170129-v1-9

In the middle of the quick reference card you find a generic model with portfolio, programme and project management as horizontal boxes. Behind these boxes you will find vertical boxes with PMO, IT, benefits management, value management and risk management to support project, programme and portfolio management. And as the background I used two triangles representing the people and maturity of project, programme and portfolio management. From this model I made connections with several well-known organizations that develop and own standards. E.g. Axelos as the owner of PRINCE2, MSP, MoP, MoV, MoR, P3M3 and ITIL or PMI as the owner of PMBoK, The standard for Portfolio Management, The standard for Programme Management, OPM3, etc. You will also find AMPG, APM, IPMA and several suppliers of Agile/Scrum as well as some ISO models. dia1 In the Dutch article, I focus on the usage of these standards. It’s not that simple that you only have to select a project management method. Je must be aware that it will not be possible to implement all your ideas and ambitions. You have to select the right initiatives. This will ask for a portfolio management method. To realize your strategic objectives, you need more than only projects. You will run programmes too, asking for a programme management method. Besides temporary project and programme offices you probably need a permanent portfolio office as well as a centre of excellence to communicate, support and train staff to use these standards and best practices.

At a certain moment you want to know were you are from a maturity view, in comparison with others, and based on your own ambition you would like to know the gap you have to bridge. It will be beneficial for an organization if all these models or frameworks are connected to each other. As a rule of thumb, I would advice an organization to choose for either Axelos or PMI as the starting point and combine your choice with the competence baseline from IPMA. If you choose e.g. for PRINCE2, it makes sense to choose for MSP and MoP for your programme and portfolio management. For maturity scans you look at P3M3 because that’s in line with these standards. Your temporary and permanent PMO will be supported by P3O, etc. For supplementary techniques you could make use of the PMBoK from PMI.

Or, when you started with the PMI family, it makes sense to combine this with the project or programme board approaches from PRINCE2 and MSP and the usage of business cases as described in PRINCE2 9789401800068_CoverLR-541x850I am one of the authors of the book Global standards and publications, edition 2014/2015, Van Haren Publishing. You can download a free copy of this book. http://www.vanharen.net/file/PDF/9789401800068.pdf Please let me know if you are aware of new standards that are worthwhile to mention in this QRC.

for a comparison between PRINCE2 and PMBoK see the overview from KnowledgeTrain: Comparison PRINCE2/PMBoK

Update:

  • 17/01/29: Added PM2 Project Management Methodology from The European Commission
  • 17/01/29: Added Scrum @ Scale from Srcuminc.com
  • 16/01/23: Added Nexus (Scaled Professional Scrum) from Scrum.org
  • 15/10/04: IPMA ICB3 replaced with ICB4
  • 15/07/07: Added new Axelos framework PRINCE2 Agile
  • 15/05/27: Added Change mgt vertical + CMBoK (Change Management body of Knowledge) + CHAMPS2
  • 15/04/24: Added ISO 21500 project, 21503 programme, 21504 portfolio, 21505 Governance, 21506 Vocabulary
  • 15/02/24: Added CCPM (Goldratt), CMMi, Global Alliance for Project Performance Standards (GAPPS)
  • 14/10/21: Added Exin Agile Scrum from EXIN
  • 14/09/29: Added Agile Programme Management (Agile PgM) from APMG
  • 14/09/29: Added PRiSM™ (Projects integrating Sustainable Methods) from GPM
  • 14/09/29: Added Portfolio, Program & Project Sustainability Model (PSM3) from GPM
Advertisements

15 responses to “Lost in standards

  1. Gilbert Silvius

    Hi Henny, Thank you for the overview!
    On new ones: Well, some developments are coming from ISO I suppose, with the standard on project governance as probably the most interesting one in development.
    And are you aware of the GPM certifications by greenprojectmanagement.org? Might be wordt mentioning. (see http://www.greenprojectmanagement.org/certification)
    Best regards, Gilbert

  2. Hi Gilbert, Thanks. I will dive into the PRISM, The GPM reference guide to sustainability in project management and their Portfolio, Program & Project sustainability Model (PSM3).

  3. Hi Henny,
    first of all. You’re doing an excelent job!

    The question:
    What’s the criteria to be included in the chart? I think there are some very popular not included.

    Thanks!
    J.

    • Hi Juan,
      Thanks for your kind words. It started with Axelos versus PMI. So my primary focus is on PPM related standards.
      Please let me know what standards you are refering to.
      Best regards
      Henny

      • Here’s a short list….
        Praxisframework
        SWEBoK or BABoK
        CMMi
        CCPM (Critical Chain Project Management)
        LEAN
        RAD and RUP (I know, it’s software development exclusive)

        Best regards
        Juan

  4. Hi Juan,
    Thanks. CMMi was already on my list. I will add it. I still want to have it on one page. for the moment I will not go into thebusiness analysis part. Goldratt CCPM is a good suggestion. I am still looking for Lean standards.
    Best regards
    Henny

  5. Interesting to see IT Management in there. As projects etc are about (major) change, where as IT mgt could contain a change component but is more often about managing the operations of IT.

    And when putting Value and Risks Management on there (which I guess should be part of project management) why not put up a vertical of change management. Especially as the lack there of often seems to be leading to unsuccessful projects.

  6. Pingback: Boekrecensie: Wegwijzer voor evalueren van IT-projecten | Henny Portman's Blog

  7. Pingback: The litte book of Portfolio Management | Henny Portman's Blog

  8. Pingback: Perdido em normas

  9. Pingback: Perdido em normas | Henny Portman's Blog

  10. Pingback: Review: How to DO projects. A Nordic flavor to managing projects | Henny Portman's Blog

  11. Pingback: A new kid on the PM methodology block: The Half Double Methodology | Henny Portman's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s